" dbu.’" <nos…@nospam.moc> wrote in message
news:nospam-63FC33.16184610032008@comcast.dca.giganews.com…
> LOL, another dimmie bites the dust.
> <http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0310082spitzer1.html>
He’ll be in good company with your Republican buddies. One difference,
though: Spitzer prefers women.
http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c197/ancientangler/RepublicanHypocr…
When you say hooker probe, do you mean awarding tow-truck contracts
illegally? Or that other type of hooker?
Jeff
" dbu.’" …
> LOL, another dimmie bites the dust.
> <http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0310082spitzer1.html>
Sorry Deeb, but the Republicans have absolutely nothing to crow about.
They’ve had way more sex scandals, just in the last year, than the
Democrats.
I’m an Independent, if anyone wants to know.
This to me, is a case of, pot-kettle-black.
Natalie
"Jeff" <…
> When you say hooker probe, do you mean awarding tow-truck contracts
> illegally? Or that other type of hooker?
> Jeff
*fwap*
You had that coming.
Natalie
witfal wrote:
> How much do you want to bet that his favorite hooker can’t hold a
> candle to his wife?
Is that included?
"witfal" <nos…@all4.me> wrote in message
news:fr49j2$t99$1@news.albasani.net…
> How much do you want to bet that his favorite hooker can’t hold a candle
> to his wife?
That issue was just settled by my son, who’s surrounded in his dorm by some
very attractive young women:
"Check that story about Spitzer. His wife’s hot. What a retard."
And that’s that.
dbu.’ wrote:
> I love this stuff, especially when it involves the dimmies. They
> deserve a good whacking. Hillary is next.
> I won’t be voting for any dimm, that’s for sure.
Dummy.
" dbu.’" …
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> "Wickeddoll®"
>> > LOL, another dimmie bites the dust.
>> > <http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0310082spitzer1.html>
>> Sorry Deeb, but the Republicans have absolutely nothing to crow about.
>> They’ve had way more sex scandals, just in the last year, than the
>> Democrats.
>> I’m an Independent, if anyone wants to know.
>> This to me, is a case of, pot-kettle-black.
>> Natalie
> But I’m not a Republican. Don’t ping on me, like don’t shoot the
> mess-enger, LOL…..
Nah, I just wanted to point out how the GOP is crowing about this, when
they’re in a glass house…and formerly senate.
> I love this stuff, especially when it involves the dimmies. They
> deserve a good whacking. Hillary is next.
> I won’t be voting for any dimm, that’s for sure.
I never say never for either side.
Natalie
" dbu.’" <nos…@nospam.moc> wrote in message
news:nospam-5F0B64.18120010032008@comcast.dca.giganews.com…
> In article
> <2453d7fc-84c2-4b72-a1c8-75682d9f7…@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
> "larry moe ‘n curly" <larrymoencu…@my-deja.com> wrote:
>> dbu.’ wrote:
>> > I love this stuff, especially when it involves the dimmies. They
>> > deserve a good whacking. Hillary is next.
>> > I won’t be voting for any dimm, that’s for sure.
>> Dummy.
> You need to re-think your stupidity.
At least he’s capable of rethinking.
" dbu.’" <nos…@nospam.moc> wrote in message
news:nospam-024707.18291410032008@comcast.dca.giganews.com…
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> In article <fr3tif.2s…@news.evilcabal.org>,
> "Wickeddoll®" <wickeddollnofeckingspam1…@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> " dbu.’" …
>> > "Wickeddoll®"
>> >> > LOL, another dimmie bites the dust.
>> >> > <http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0310082spitzer1.html>
>> >> Sorry Deeb, but the Republicans have absolutely nothing to crow about.
>> >> They’ve had way more sex scandals, just in the last year, than the
>> >> Democrats.
>> >> I’m an Independent, if anyone wants to know.
>> >> This to me, is a case of, pot-kettle-black.
>> >> Natalie
>> > But I’m not a Republican. Don’t ping on me, like don’t shoot the
>> > mess-enger, LOL…..
>> Nah, I just wanted to point out how the GOP is crowing about this, when
>> they’re in a glass house…and formerly senate.
> I have not heard the GOP say one blinking thing about the NY gov and his
> problems.
They can’t say anything as long as there’s stuff like this:
http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c197/ancientangler/RepublicanHypocr...
When you live in a glass house, you don’t throw stones.
" dbu.’" <nos…@nospam.moc> wrote in message
news:nospam-5F0B64.18120010032008@comcast.dca.giganews.com…
> In article
> <2453d7fc-84c2-4b72-a1c8-75682d9f7…@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
> "larry moe ‘n curly" <larrymoencu…@my-deja.com> wrote:
>> dbu.’ wrote:
>> > I love this stuff, especially when it involves the dimmies.
But not when it involves Republicans, then?
They
>> > deserve a good whacking. Hillary is next.
>> > I won’t be voting for any dimm, that’s for sure.
>> Dummy.
> You need to re-think your stupidity.
This coming from a person who repeatedly vows to never, ever vote for a
person of a certain mainstream party. Which then means it would affect your
voting not only in national elections, but also state & local ones. What
happens when you don’t like the other candidate(s), & you do like – or at
least can tolerate – a candidate who’s running on the Dem. ticket?
Cathy
" dbu.’" <nos…@nospam.moc> wrote in message
news:nospam-3E0A3D.17084610032008@comcast.dca.giganews.com…
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> In article <fr3p3f.2l…@news.evilcabal.org>,
> "Wickeddoll®" <wickeddollnofeckingspam1…@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> " dbu.’" …
>> > LOL, another dimmie bites the dust.
>> > <http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0310082spitzer1.html>
>> Sorry Deeb, but the Republicans have absolutely nothing to crow about.
>> They’ve had way more sex scandals, just in the last year, than the
>> Democrats.
>> I’m an Independent, if anyone wants to know.
>> This to me, is a case of, pot-kettle-black.
>> Natalie
> But I’m not a Republican. Don’t ping on me, like don’t shoot the
> mess-enger, LOL…..
dbu, you say you’re not a Republican, but since you’d never vote for a
Democrat, you make an awfully good replica of a Republican……and you’re
always sitting in Scott’s lap, getting stroked.
BTW, where is Scott? Is he back in the woodwork?
" dbu.’" <nos…@nospam.moc> wrote in message
news:nospam-B63EA5.18555910032008@comcast.dca.giganews.com…
> In article <3AjBj.5756$Sa1.1…@news02.roc.ny>,
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborea…@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> When you live in a glass house, you don’t throw stones.
> Oh my is that a new one for ya joe????
> You learned something today didn’t you.
Address the issue of hot gay Republican sex scandals, or shut the fuck up.
Address the issue NOW.
" dbu.’"
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> "Wickeddoll®"
>> >> > LOL, another dimmie bites the dust.
>> >> > <http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0310082spitzer1.html>
>> >> Sorry Deeb, but the Republicans have absolutely nothing to crow about.
>> >> They’ve had way more sex scandals, just in the last year, than the
>> >> Democrats.
>> >> I’m an Independent, if anyone wants to know.
>> >> This to me, is a case of, pot-kettle-black.
>> >> Natalie
>> > But I’m not a Republican. Don’t ping on me, like don’t shoot the
>> > mess-enger, LOL…..
>> Nah, I just wanted to point out how the GOP is crowing about this, when
>> they’re in a glass house…and formerly senate.
> I have not heard the GOP say one blinking thing about the NY gov and his
> problems.
I saw it somewhere – I’ll see if I can find it. It wasn’t the GOP as an
organization, but it was a GOP politico.
Natalie
"Wickeddoll®" <wickeddollnofeckingspam1…@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fr432a.2co.1@news.evilcabal.org…
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> " dbu.’"
>> "Wickeddoll®"
>>> >> > LOL, another dimmie bites the dust.
>>> >> > <http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0310082spitzer1.html>
>>> >> Sorry Deeb, but the Republicans have absolutely nothing to crow
>>> >> about.
>>> >> They’ve had way more sex scandals, just in the last year, than the
>>> >> Democrats.
>>> >> I’m an Independent, if anyone wants to know.
>>> >> This to me, is a case of, pot-kettle-black.
>>> >> Natalie
>>> > But I’m not a Republican. Don’t ping on me, like don’t shoot the
>>> > mess-enger, LOL…..
>>> Nah, I just wanted to point out how the GOP is crowing about this, when
>>> they’re in a glass house…and formerly senate.
>> I have not heard the GOP say one blinking thing about the NY gov and his
>> problems.
> I saw it somewhere – I’ll see if I can find it. It wasn’t the GOP as an
> organization, but it was a GOP politico.
> Natalie
If they appear too jolly, there may be questions asked about why the feds
were looking at this pros ring to begin with. You know where THAT could
lead…
"JoeSpareBedroom"…
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> "Wickeddoll®"…
>> " dbu.’"
>>>> >> > LOL, another dimmie bites the dust.
>>>> >> > <http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0310082spitzer1.html>
>>>> >> Sorry Deeb, but the Republicans have absolutely nothing to crow
>>>> >> about.
>>>> >> They’ve had way more sex scandals, just in the last year, than the
>>>> >> Democrats.
>>>> >> I’m an Independent, if anyone wants to know.
>>>> >> This to me, is a case of, pot-kettle-black.
>>>> >> Natalie
>>>> > But I’m not a Republican. Don’t ping on me, like don’t shoot the
>>>> > mess-enger, LOL…..
>>>> Nah, I just wanted to point out how the GOP is crowing about this, when
>>>> they’re in a glass house…and formerly senate.
>>> I have not heard the GOP say one blinking thing about the NY gov and his
>>> problems.
>> I saw it somewhere – I’ll see if I can find it. It wasn’t the GOP as an
>> organization, but it was a GOP politico.
>> Natalie
> If they appear too jolly, there may be questions asked about why the feds
> were looking at this pros ring to begin with. You know where THAT could
> lead…
*snerk*
Natalie
" dbu.’" <nos…@nospam.moc> wrote in message
news:nospam-7FCAF1.19561910032008@comcast.dca.giganews.com…
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> In article <XdydnUEq3_sTUUjaRVn_…@giganews.com>,
> "Cathy F." <clfrc…@adelphiadotdashdot.net> wrote:
>> " dbu.’" <nos…@nospam.moc> wrote in message
>> news:nospam-5F0B64.18120010032008@comcast.dca.giganews.com…
>> > In article
>> > <2453d7fc-84c2-4b72-a1c8-75682d9f7…@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
>> > "larry moe ‘n curly" <larrymoencu…@my-deja.com> wrote:
>> >> dbu.’ wrote:
>> >> > I love this stuff, especially when it involves the dimmies.
>> But not when it involves Republicans, then?
>> They
>> >> > deserve a good whacking. Hillary is next.
>> >> > I won’t be voting for any dimm, that’s for sure.
>> >> Dummy.
>> > You need to re-think your stupidity.
>> This coming from a person who repeatedly vows to never, ever vote for a
>> person of a certain mainstream party. Which then means it would affect
>> your
>> voting not only in national elections, but also state & local ones. What
>> happens when you don’t like the other candidate(s), & you do like – or at
>> least can tolerate – a candidate who’s running on the Dem. ticket?
>> Cathy
> You got it right. I won’t be voting for any dimmie in November.
> Barrak looks good, I wish he were conservative. I won’t vote for him
In what way does he look good to you?
" dbu.’" <nos…@nospam.moc> wrote in message
news:nospam-796991.19570910032008@comcast.dca.giganews.com…
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> In article <sekBj.5876$7d1.3…@news01.roc.ny>,
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborea…@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> " dbu.’" <nos…@nospam.moc> wrote in message
>> news:nospam-B63EA5.18555910032008@comcast.dca.giganews.com…
>> > In article <3AjBj.5756$Sa1.1…@news02.roc.ny>,
>> > "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborea…@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> When you live in a glass house, you don’t throw stones.
>> > Oh my is that a new one for ya joe????
>> > You learned something today didn’t you.
>> Address the issue of hot gay Republican sex scandals, or shut the fuck
>> up.
>> Address the issue NOW.
> I can tell you’re upset. I feel your pain. …
Nope. I’m calling you out. Discuss hot gay Republican sex scandals.
You can’t.
" dbu.’" <nos…@nospam.moc> wrote in message
news:nospam-3E1FD0.20051210032008@comcast.dca.giganews.com…
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> In article <fr43lp.3c…@news.evilcabal.org>,
> "Wickeddoll®" <wickeddollnofeckingspam1…@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> "JoeSpareBedroom"…
>> > "Wickeddoll®"…
>> >> " dbu.’"
>> >>>> >> > LOL, another dimmie bites the dust.
>> >>>> >> > <http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0310082spitzer1.htm
>> >>>> >> > l>
>> >>>> >> Sorry Deeb, but the Republicans have absolutely nothing to crow
>> >>>> >> about.
>> >>>> >> They’ve had way more sex scandals, just in the last year, than
>> >>>> >> the
>> >>>> >> Democrats.
>> >>>> >> I’m an Independent, if anyone wants to know.
>> >>>> >> This to me, is a case of, pot-kettle-black.
>> >>>> >> Natalie
>> >>>> > But I’m not a Republican. Don’t ping on me, like don’t shoot the
>> >>>> > mess-enger, LOL…..
>> >>>> Nah, I just wanted to point out how the GOP is crowing about this,
>> >>>> when
>> >>>> they’re in a glass house…and formerly senate.
>> >>> I have not heard the GOP say one blinking thing about the NY gov and
>> >>> his
>> >>> problems.
>> >> I saw it somewhere – I’ll see if I can find it. It wasn’t the GOP as
>> >> an
>> >> organization, but it was a GOP politico.
>> >> Natalie
>> > If they appear too jolly, there may be questions asked about why the
>> > feds
>> > were looking at this pros ring to begin with. You know where THAT could
>> > lead…
>> *snerk*
>> Natalie
> joe is in mourning tonight, leave him be. Poor joe, sorry for your
> loss.
Right over your head, as always.
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
dbu.’ wrote:
> In article <XdydnUEq3_sTUUjaRVn_…@giganews.com>,
> "Cathy F." <clfrc…@adelphiadotdashdot.net> wrote:
> I won’t be voting for any dimm, that’s for sure.
> >> Dummy.
> You need to re-think your stupidity.
> > This coming from a person who repeatedly vows to never, ever vote for a
> > person of a certain mainstream party. Which then means it would affect your
> > voting not only in national elections, but also state & local ones. What
> > happens when you don’t like the other candidate(s), & you do like – or at
> > least can tolerate – a candidate who’s running on the Dem. ticket?
> You got it right. I won’t be voting for any dimmie in November.
> Barrak looks good, I wish he were conservative. I won’t vote for him
> either. He’s a damn good speaker and smart. He’ll give McCain a good
> run.
Don’t vote for my US senator.
"witfal" <nos…@all4.me> wrote in message
news:fr4m4v$gnd$1@news.albasani.net…
> On 2008-03-10 17:46:14 -0700, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborea…@yahoo.com>
> said:
>> If they appear too jolly, there may be questions asked about why the feds
>> were looking at this pros ring to begin with. You know where THAT could
>> lead…
> It actually wasn’t the pro ring that got their attention. It was
> Spitzer’s banking habits.
> http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4424507&page=1
He’s phuqued. He’s an attorney. He should just go quietly.
mack wrote:
> " dbu.’" <nos…@nospam.moc> wrote in message
> news:nospam-3E0A3D.17084610032008@comcast.dca.giganews.com…
> > But I’m not a Republican. Don’t ping on me, like don’t shoot the
> > mess-enger, LOL…..
> dbu, you say you’re not a Republican, but since you’d never vote for a
> Democrat, you make an awfully good replica of a Republican……and you’re
> always sitting in Scott’s lap, getting stroked.
I wouldn’t call it "sitting"
> BTW, where is Scott? Is he back in the woodwork?
He failed to register with the local police as a sex offender.
" dbu.’" <nos…@nospam.moc> wrote in message
news:nospam-7FCAF1.19561910032008@comcast.dca.giganews.com…
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> In article <XdydnUEq3_sTUUjaRVn_…@giganews.com>,
> "Cathy F." <clfrc…@adelphiadotdashdot.net> wrote:
>> " dbu.’" <nos…@nospam.moc> wrote in message
>> news:nospam-5F0B64.18120010032008@comcast.dca.giganews.com…
>> > In article
>> > <2453d7fc-84c2-4b72-a1c8-75682d9f7…@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
>> > "larry moe ‘n curly" <larrymoencu…@my-deja.com> wrote:
>> >> dbu.’ wrote:
>> >> > I love this stuff, especially when it involves the dimmies.
>> But not when it involves Republicans, then?
>> They
>> >> > deserve a good whacking. Hillary is next.
>> >> > I won’t be voting for any dimm, that’s for sure.
>> >> Dummy.
>> > You need to re-think your stupidity.
>> This coming from a person who repeatedly vows to never, ever vote for a
>> person of a certain mainstream party. Which then means it would affect
>> your
>> voting not only in national elections, but also state & local ones. What
>> happens when you don’t like the other candidate(s), & you do like – or at
>> least can tolerate – a candidate who’s running on the Dem. ticket?
>> Cathy
> You got it right. I won’t be voting for any dimmie in November.
You say, "I won’t vote for a(ny) Dimmie." You don’t say, "I won’t vote
democrat in this year’s national election." Not the same thing. You’re now
backtracking – qualifying, trying to wiggle out of a tight spot. Which you
put yourself in, to begin with.
> Barrak looks good, I wish he were conservative. I won’t vote for him
> either. He’s a damn good speaker and smart.
He looks good to you (assuming you think he’d make a good president vs. you
like his physical looks), you think he speaks well, & that he’s bright. But
you’re ruling him out anyway.
He’ll give McCain a good
> run.
More than a good run, is my guess. Barack Obama has the ability to fire
people up & make them hopeful about him as president; John McCain doesn’t
seem to have that effect.
Cathy
" dbu.’" <nos…@nospam.moc> wrote in message
news:nospam-3E0A3D.17084610032008@comcast.dca.giganews.com…
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> In article <fr3p3f.2l…@news.evilcabal.org>,
> "Wickeddoll®" <wickeddollnofeckingspam1…@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> " dbu.’" …
>> > LOL, another dimmie bites the dust.
>> > <http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0310082spitzer1.html>
>> Sorry Deeb, but the Republicans have absolutely nothing to crow about.
>> They’ve had way more sex scandals, just in the last year, than the
>> Democrats.
>> I’m an Independent, if anyone wants to know.
>> This to me, is a case of, pot-kettle-black.
>> Natalie
> But I’m not a Republican.
Could’ve fooled me. You’re about as conservative as they get, AFAICT.
Something tells me it’s a technicality vs. practicality.
Cathy
Don’t ping on me, like don’t shoot the
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> mess-enger, LOL…..
> I love this stuff, especially when it involves the dimmies. They
> deserve a good whacking. Hillary is next.
> I won’t be voting for any dimm, that’s for sure.
> —
> "The trouble with our liberal friends is
> not that they’re ignorant: It’s just that they know
> so much that isn’t so." – Ronald Reagan
"Cathy F." <clfrc…@adelphiadotdashdot.net> wrote in message
news:nL-dnWKx3oFnfUja4p2dnAA@giganews.com…
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> " dbu.’" <nos…@nospam.moc> wrote in message
> news:nospam-7FCAF1.19561910032008@comcast.dca.giganews.com…
>> In article <XdydnUEq3_sTUUjaRVn_…@giganews.com>,
>> "Cathy F." <clfrc…@adelphiadotdashdot.net> wrote:
>>> " dbu.’" <nos…@nospam.moc> wrote in message
>>> news:nospam-5F0B64.18120010032008@comcast.dca.giganews.com…
>>> > In article
>>> > <2453d7fc-84c2-4b72-a1c8-75682d9f7…@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
>>> > "larry moe ‘n curly" <larrymoencu…@my-deja.com> wrote:
>>> >> dbu.’ wrote:
>>> >> > I love this stuff, especially when it involves the dimmies.
>>> But not when it involves Republicans, then?
>>> They
>>> >> > deserve a good whacking. Hillary is next.
>>> >> > I won’t be voting for any dimm, that’s for sure.
>>> >> Dummy.
>>> > You need to re-think your stupidity.
>>> This coming from a person who repeatedly vows to never, ever vote for a
>>> person of a certain mainstream party. Which then means it would affect
>>> your
>>> voting not only in national elections, but also state & local ones.
>>> What
>>> happens when you don’t like the other candidate(s), & you do like – or
>>> at
>>> least can tolerate – a candidate who’s running on the Dem. ticket?
>>> Cathy
>> You got it right. I won’t be voting for any dimmie in November.
> You say, "I won’t vote for a(ny) Dimmie." You don’t say, "I won’t vote
> democrat in this year’s national election." Not the same thing. You’re
> now backtracking – qualifying, trying to wiggle out of a tight spot.
> Which you put yourself in, to begin with.
>> Barrak looks good, I wish he were conservative. I won’t vote for him
>> either. He’s a damn good speaker and smart.
> He looks good to you (assuming you think he’d make a good president vs.
> you like his physical looks), you think he speaks well, & that he’s
> bright. But you’re ruling him out anyway.
dbu prefers "Is our children learning?"
witfal wrote:
> http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/10/spitzer/index.html
> Better than ever.
Spitzer should have proudly defended his integrity by saying, "I paid
for the prostitutes with my own money, not government funds, and never
was any political favor granted! Besides, all the women were good-
looking, and I always first asked my wife to join into threesomes with
them!"