2015 Ford Escape
The compact SUV segment is hot, hot, hot these days, and the Toyota RAV4 and Ford Escape are two of the longstanding pillars of the segment. Both have been around for more than 15 years, each has grown with the segment, and both were redesigned for 2013.
Which is the better pick? The Escape decisively beat the RAV4 in our comparison, with higher scores for styling and interior design, fuel efficiency, and a strong advantage in performance.
The current Ford Escape brought an attractive, athletic look and a vastly improved interior to a model previously known for its upright, SUV-like lines and utilitarian cabin. Now the Escape offers rakish angles and almost the look of a hot hatchback, while the Toyota‘s more evolutionary styling direction–a few odd lines included–is tidy but lacking in charm. Both have high and somewhat busy front-end designs.
Behind the wheel, the Escape’s combination of a rather low dash but upright driving position feels a little more carlike than the RAV4’s tall, boxy cabin. The RAV4 is supposed to get some upgrades for 2016, but this year, the cabin trims and surfaces of the top models feel cut-rate (the base LE has more charm). The Escape offers a well-damped, taut ride and sportier roadholding than the pedestrian RAV4’s softer, more compliant suspension and body roll in corners. It also suffers from Toyota’s typically numb electric power steering, whereas the Escape provides adequate (simulated) feedback through the wheel.
Both are among the roomier crossovers in the compact category, with room for four adults. We felt Ford’s front seats were exceptionally good, although Toyota’s are comfortably firm with thinner padding, avoiding the couch-cushion effect. As for general cabin refinement, both are good, with each maker delivering significant gains over the prior generations. In the RAV4, you still hear the engine perhaps more than you should, and Ford’s larger turbo engine can become raucous when pushed hard as well.
The Toyota RAV4 offers only a single powertrain for now: a 176-horsepower 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine with a six-speed automatic transmission. It works adequately, but it’s not at all sporty. New for 2016, however, will be a RAV4 Hybrid model that uses a similar powertrain to that of the Camry Hybrid–a 2.5-liter four combined with Toyota’s Hybrid Synergy Drive system for a total of 194 hp.
The Escape offers three different engines, two of them turbocharged EcoBoost fours. The top 240-horsepower 2.0-liter four can hit 60 mph in under 8 seconds, even with only a six-speed automatic transmission. The pair of less powerful engines are a base 2.5-liter four with 170 hp, found mostly in rental cars, and a turbo 1.6-liter four with 178 hp that’s more likely to be the other choice for retail buyers.
Both vehicles offer a choice of front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, though both default to FWD in light duty. Each AWD system serves its intended purpose of adding confidence on snowy driveways or through muddy trails. Optional all-wheel drive in next year’s RAV4 Hybrid is provided not by a mechanical system, however, but an additional electric motor between the rear wheels.
The two are tied on fuel economy ratings, with the best Escape equaling the RAV4 model is rated at 26 mpg combined. Both are far below standouts like the Mazda CX-5, which can go as high as 29 mpg combined in FWD form. The AWD version of the most powerful Ford with the 2.0-liter turbo engine, however, falls to 23 mpg–though it can tow up to 3,500 pounds. Keep in mind that the comparison will change for the 2016 model year with the introduction of the RAV4 Hybrid, offering combined fuel-economy ratings of 30 mpg or higher.
The RAV4 was retested this past year, with its federal safety rating boosted to five stars overall; meanwhile it earns all ‘good’ ratings from the IIHS. There’s no front crash prevention technology on offer, but a blind-spot monitoring system with rear cross-traffic monitoring is available with a Tech package. The Ford Escape, however, remains at ‘poor’ in the IIHS small-overlap frontal crash test.
The Toyota RAV4 offers a little more value for the money than the Escape, going down the feature lists, but we found the Escape felt like a higher-quality vehicle. It reads as if it’s in a class above, if you shop by feature lists, including options for leather, a panoramic sunroof, MyFord Touch’s voice-command controls, even a hands-free tailgate that opens or closes with the wave of a foot. The best value in the RAV4 line are the higher-level XLE and LE trims, priced somewhat below comparable Ford models, which can rise quickly above $30,000 with a heavy hand on the options list.
In the end, these are two different approaches to a compact crossover utility vehicle. The Ford is more stylish, has nicer-quality interior finishes, and drives and handles with a sportier and more pleasurable feel. It’s let down only by questionable real-world gas mileage and the high prices of its top models. The Toyota is a safe choice that’s likely to be reliable, durable, and predictable, but doesn’t excel in any single area. If you don’t care much about driving and the design appeals to you, the Toyota may be a better value–but we pick the Ford because it’s a nicer vehicle to spend time in.